Two Case Studies of Russian Propaganda in Romania and Hungary

budapest-2030015_960_720.jpg

The Kremlin’s current disinformation campaign against the West, unlike similar projects undertaken during the Cold War, is no longer based on the dissemination of an overarching ideology or “selling” Russia as an alternative. The contemporary logic of propaganda takes a highly nation-specific approach, and messages differ widely in subject matter, tone, character, and frequency. By examining the nature of state-sponsored propaganda, it is possible to determine whether the Kremlin views individual nations as friendly, up-for-grabs, or hostile, and what the underlying goals of such coverage may be. While the Kremlin’s propaganda campaign is multilayered and spans a wide variety of platforms, this paper focuses on messaging and its evolution from two outlets that often serve as starting points for the spread of disinformation: Sputnik and RT. In order to determine differences in coverage and government perception, Hungary and Romania are chosen for their near polar opposite representation in the aforementioned outlets.

Miranda Sieg, Former Staff Writer

Miranda Sieg is a second-year Masters Student at the George Washington University Elliott School of International Affairs studying Security, Development and Conflict Resolution. She is primarily focused on education and cross-cultural violence issues in East and Southeast Asia, but has recently developed an interest in post-conflict development and the integration of refugees and at risk migrants. Miranda spent two and a half years studying and working in Japan and traveling extensively in East and Southeast Asia. She currently works for the International Education Program at GW and is a Presidential Management Fellow Finalist and GW UNESCO Fellow.

Previous
Previous

Book Review: Tokens of War

Next
Next

Iran’s Evolving Maritime Strategy: A Shift Towards Long-Range Operations